Google and DOJ Battle Over Technical Feasibility of Chrome Separation
Could Google Be Forced to Sell Chrome? The Battle Over Browser Ownership

Google is currently embroiled in a legal battle following last year's court ruling against its alleged search monopoly. New details emerge daily from the courtroom, and the latest development centers around the potential forced sale of Google Chrome. Google argues that the browser's intricate integration with its other services makes it impossible for any other company to manage effectively.
The Potential Breakup of Google and the Fate of Chrome
One possible outcome of this trial is the breakup of Google, with the sale of Chrome being a frequently discussed remedy. Several companies, including OpenAI, Perplexity, DuckDuckGo, and Yahoo, have expressed interest in acquiring the popular browser should it become available.
Google's Argument: Chrome is Too Complex for Others to Handle
According to Bloomberg, Google contends that no other company possesses the necessary expertise and infrastructure to run Chrome effectively. While it appears to be a standalone application, Chrome relies on a complex network of interconnected services, many of which depend on Google's servers and specialized knowledge.
Parisa Tabriz, Chrome's General Manager, testified during Friday's proceedings, stating, “Chrome today represents 17 years of collaboration between the Chrome people.” She further emphasized the unprecedented nature of attempting to disentangle such a deeply integrated system.
Tabriz explained that crucial Chrome features like safe browsing and password breach notifications rely heavily on Google's backend infrastructure. She argued that if Google were forced to sell Chrome, these essential services would likely cease to function.
The DOJ's Counterargument: Chrome Separation is Feasible
The Department of Justice (DOJ) presented a counterargument through their expert witness, James Mickens, a computer science professor at Harvard. Mickens disagreed with Google's assessment, asserting that "the divestiture of Chrome is feasible from a technical perspective. It would be feasible to transfer ownership and not break too much.”
The Likelihood of Chrome's Sale and Its Potential Cost
While the trial's outcome remains uncertain, the forced sale of Chrome appears to be a likely scenario. Google will be presented with a list of remedies, and the divestiture of Chrome seems to be the most significant change they might face. However, the unpredictable nature of such legal proceedings means nothing is guaranteed. The trial is expected to continue for approximately two weeks. It's estimated that if Google is forced to sell Chrome, the price tag could exceed $50 billion.
What This Means for Users
The potential sale of Chrome raises significant questions about the future of the browser. Would its functionality remain the same under new ownership? Would user data be handled differently? These are crucial considerations that will undoubtedly be explored as the trial progresses. The outcome of this case could reshape the landscape of the internet and have a profound impact on how we browse the web.
This situation highlights the ongoing debate over the power and influence of tech giants like Google. The trial's outcome will set a precedent for future antitrust cases and could significantly impact the future of the tech industry.
The post Google and DOJ Battle Over Technical Feasibility of Chrome Separation appeared first on Android Headlines.
from AndroidHeadlines
-via DynaSage